Un estudio realizado por investigadores de la Cátedra UNESCO de Ciclo de Vida y Cambio Climático ESCI-UPF y la Universidad de Cantabria, publicado en la revista Science of the Total Environment, propone una base novedosa para comparar los análisis de ciclo de vida de las dietas.
“Dietary choices, a main driver of food production, play a significant role within the climate change arena. Consequently, there is a growing trend on publishing research assessing the environmental impacts of diets and dietary shifts, mainly following the life cycle assessment (LCA) standardised methodology,” according to the researchers. However, “several methodological issues still bring a challenge, especially in the definition of the function, and the quantification of the functional unit of diets,” they add.
Now, by providing a proper basis for comparison, researchers aim to set a framework for future diet-related LCA studies quantifying all relevant emissions and resources consumed and the related environmental impacts associated with diets.
The purpose of the assessment is defined in the first phase of the LCA, and decisions are made about the details of the system being studied and how the study will be conducted: researchers define what to analyse and how, including the system’s function and its functional unit, a measure of the performance of a product or system for use as a reference unit in an LCA study. Thus, an appropriate definition of a functional unit is crucial for comparative LCA studies.
“Most food- and diet-related studies select a mass-based functional unit; however, this does not cover the main function of food in providing nutrition,” says director at the Chair and co-author of the study Pere Fullana i Palmer. Now, scientists have defined the function of diets as the supply of the daily required amount of calories and nutrients and proposed a novel functional unit that considers both the energy intake and the nutritional quality of the diet. “In this manner, diets that differ in energy and nutritional intake can be compared,” adds Fullana.
“In order to compare the performance of the proposed functional unit to the most common ones used for diet LCAs, we have assessed dietary scenarios within the Spanish context,” explains Laura Batlle-Bayer, first author of the study and leader of the agrifood research line at the Chair. “While it has been used specifically for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in this study, it may be applicable to any LCA-related environmental impact category,” she adds.
By assessing Spanish dietary scenarios, researchers have found that “using a mass-based functional unit, GHG emissions are underestimated, since the nutrition properties of food are not considered,” according to the scientists. In contrast, “when using the caloric- and nutrient-corrected functional unit, the comparison of GHG emissions among diets is energetic and nutritionally independent, and therefore it allows a proper comparison,” they conclude.
This study is part of the “Ceres-Procon Project: Food production and consumption strategies for climate change mitigation”, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, through the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).
Una investigación muestra la importancia de reducir las pérdidas de alimentos, ya que casi el 20% de la producción nacional se pierde a lo largo de su cadena de suministro. Este trabajo está en línea con los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible que exigen reducir a la mitad el desperdicio de alimentos a nivel de retail y consumidores.
¿Cuántos gases de efecto invernadero emite nuestra dieta? Científicos estudian las emisiones y la calidad nutricional del consumo actual y el desperdicio de alimentos de un ciudadano español promedio, comparándolas con dos dietas alternativas de acuerdo con las guías alimentarias españolas y la dieta mediterránea.